Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2015 (3) TMI 434 - AT - Service Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Grants Stay on Recovery of Service Tax Demands The Tribunal decided to waive the pre-deposit requirement and grant a stay on the recovery of service tax demands amounting to over &8377;19 crore for ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal Grants Stay on Recovery of Service Tax Demands

                            The Tribunal decided to waive the pre-deposit requirement and grant a stay on the recovery of service tax demands amounting to over &8377;19 crore for management services and &8377;2 crore for club/association services. It noted discrepancies in the lower authority's consideration of the appellant's submissions and legal precedents supporting the appellant's position. The Tribunal questioned the classification of the appellant's activities as event management services, highlighting contradictions in the show-cause notice and ultimate findings. It found merit in the appellant's arguments regarding the time-barred demand and the unique nature of their role as a cricket governing body, leading to the decision to grant the stay.




                            Issues:
                            1. Whether the requirement of pre-deposit should be waived and stay granted.
                            2. Service tax demand on management and club/association services.
                            3. Consideration of submissions by the lower authority.
                            4. Tax liability on event management and club/association services.
                            5. Classification of bundled services and time-barred demand.
                            6. Arguments regarding cricket matches as events managed by the appellant.
                            7. Contradictions in the show-cause notice and ultimate findings.

                            Analysis:
                            1. The Tribunal deliberated on the issue of pre-deposit requirement and stay during the appeal. The focus was on determining if the demand of over &8377; 19 crore for service tax on management services and &8377; 2 crore for club/association services should be waived. The Tribunal decided to postpone detailed discussions on all issues and only considered essential details to decide on the pre-deposit requirement and stay.

                            2. The appellant contended that they had already paid a substantial amount, but their submissions were not considered by the lower authority. They also cited legal precedents where similar services were held not liable for service tax. The Tribunal noted penalties imposed under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act and the appellant's grievances regarding non-consideration of crucial submissions.

                            3. Detailed submissions were made by the appellant regarding the tax liability on event management and club/association services. They argued against the classification of cricket activities as taxable events, emphasizing their unique position as a cricket governing body. The appellant raised concerns about the arbitrary nature of the adjudication process and the inclusion of irrelevant items in the taxable value.

                            4. The Tribunal analyzed the nature of the services provided by the appellant in relation to cricket matches. It was argued that the appellant's role was not that of an event manager but a cricket governing body affiliated with the BCCI. The Tribunal observed contradictions in the show-cause notice and the ultimate findings, questioning the basis for considering the appellant's activities as event management services.

                            5. The appellant highlighted errors in the classification of bundled services and argued that the demand was time-barred due to misinterpretation of their role as an event manager. The Tribunal considered the income heads and activities of the appellant to determine if the tax was levied on the event itself rather than on event management services.

                            6. The arguments presented by the Revenue focused on portraying cricket matches as events managed and organized by the appellant. However, the Tribunal scrutinized the actual responsibilities and activities of the appellant in conducting cricket matches, emphasizing the distinction between managing events and conducting cricket matches.

                            7. The Tribunal noted contradictions in the observations made in the show-cause notice and the Commissioner's conclusions. The lack of clarity regarding the appellant's role in providing event management services to BCCI raised doubts about the validity of the tax demand. Ultimately, the Tribunal found merit in the appellant's case for waiving the pre-deposit requirement and granting a stay against recovery during the appeal process.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found