<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 434 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257498</link>
    <description>The Tribunal decided to waive the pre-deposit requirement and grant a stay on the recovery of service tax demands amounting to over &amp;amp;8377;19 crore for management services and &amp;amp;8377;2 crore for club/association services. It noted discrepancies in the lower authority&#039;s consideration of the appellant&#039;s submissions and legal precedents supporting the appellant&#039;s position. The Tribunal questioned the classification of the appellant&#039;s activities as event management services, highlighting contradictions in the show-cause notice and ultimate findings. It found merit in the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the time-barred demand and the unique nature of their role as a cricket governing body, leading to the decision to grant the stay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 12:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=378587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 434 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257498</link>
      <description>The Tribunal decided to waive the pre-deposit requirement and grant a stay on the recovery of service tax demands amounting to over &amp;amp;8377;19 crore for management services and &amp;amp;8377;2 crore for club/association services. It noted discrepancies in the lower authority&#039;s consideration of the appellant&#039;s submissions and legal precedents supporting the appellant&#039;s position. The Tribunal questioned the classification of the appellant&#039;s activities as event management services, highlighting contradictions in the show-cause notice and ultimate findings. It found merit in the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the time-barred demand and the unique nature of their role as a cricket governing body, leading to the decision to grant the stay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>