Appellate Tribunal extends stay beyond 365 days, citing precedent. Backlog leads to extension; not due to appellant. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai extended the stay beyond 365 days in a case, citing the precedent set in a previous case. The extension was granted ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appellate Tribunal extends stay beyond 365 days, citing precedent. Backlog leads to extension; not due to appellant.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai extended the stay beyond 365 days in a case, citing the precedent set in a previous case. The extension was granted due to the significant backlog of appeals, and the Tribunal clarified that extensions can be given if the delay is not caused by the appellant's actions.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai extended stay beyond 365 days in a case due to huge pendency of appeals, following the precedent set in the case of M/s Haldiram India Pvt. Ltd. & Others. The Tribunal can grant extension if delay is not due to appellant's actions.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.