<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 77 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257141</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai extended the stay beyond 365 days in a case, citing the precedent set in a previous case. The extension was granted due to the significant backlog of appeals, and the Tribunal clarified that extensions can be given if the delay is not caused by the appellant&#039;s actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 18:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 77 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257141</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai extended the stay beyond 365 days in a case, citing the precedent set in a previous case. The extension was granted due to the significant backlog of appeals, and the Tribunal clarified that extensions can be given if the delay is not caused by the appellant&#039;s actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>