Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in appeals concerning classification of imported coal and eligibility to exemption.
Analysis: The appeal stage dispute was found to require deeper examination on the classification of the imported coal and the consequent applicability of Notification No. 12/2012-Cus. The order noted that the parties had raised substantial arguments on the tariff interpretation, the relevance of the chapter note, the nature of the coal described in import documents, and the effect of the claimed exemption. At the stay stage, the tribunal found the matter arguable and contentious and therefore considered it appropriate to impose a condition for hearing the appeals on merits. It also took note of amounts already deposited by one appellant while fixing differential pre-deposit amounts for the others.
Conclusion: Partial waiver of pre-deposit was granted on condition of specified deposits, and recovery of the balance demand was stayed pending disposal of the appeals.