Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the condition in Notification No. 30/2004-C.E. dated 9-7-2004, denying exemption where credit of duty on inputs has been taken under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002, applied to imported silk yarn and silk fabric so as to justify levy of countervailing duty.
Analysis: The imported goods were eligible for exemption under the notification, subject to the stated condition. The decisive question was whether, during the relevant period, an Indian manufacturer of silk yarn or silk fabric could in fact have taken Cenvat credit on duty-paid inputs. The finding was that raw silk or silk filament, being dutiable at nil rate, was not liable to excise duty, and silk yarn used for fabric also did not attract countervailing duty during the material period. As no input-duty credit could realistically have been availed by a domestic manufacturer, the condition attached to the notification was held to be inapplicable to the imported goods.
Conclusion: The demand of countervailing duty on the imported silk yarn and silk fabric was not sustainable, and the assessee was entitled to the exemption.