Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondents were entitled to exemption from payment of countervailing duty on imported undyed and unprinted silk fabrics under Notification No. 30/2004-C.E. dated 09.07.2004, notwithstanding the objection that the corresponding excise condition was not fulfilled.
Analysis: The dispute was treated as covered by earlier decisions holding that, for levy of additional customs duty under Section 3(1) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, the imported goods have to be examined with reference to the applicable exemption notification and the position of the like article in India. It was found that, during the relevant period, the Indian manufacturer of the relevant yarn and fabric would not have been required to take Cenvat credit on inputs because the inputs were not chargeable to excise duty. In that situation, the condition attached to the notification did not defeat the exemption claim, and the demand of CVD was not sustainable.
Conclusion: The respondents were entitled to the exemption and the Revenue's challenge failed.