Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the composite items manufactured by the appellants, namely cardio vascular sutures and atraumatic needled sutures, were classifiable under Entry 90.18 of Chapter 90 so as to qualify for exemption under the relevant exemption notifications, or under Entry 3005.90 as suturing material.
Analysis: The goods were integrated products consisting of a needle and suturing material for surgical use. The wider expression "surgical appliances" in Entry 90.18 was held to be more appropriate than the narrower treatment of the suturing material as a Chapter 30 item. The later notifications issued under Section 5A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 were treated as confirming the intention to exempt such life-saving and sight-saving articles, and the earlier notifications were construed accordingly. A narrow construction that confined the items to the residuary entry was rejected.
Conclusion: The items fell within Entry 90.18 and the appellants were entitled to exemption from the whole of the duty of excise on the goods.
Ratio Decidendi: An exemption notification covering surgical appliances should be construed to include a composite surgical product whose essential character is that of a surgical appliance, and later clarificatory notifications may be relied upon to confirm that wider meaning.