Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether imported low ash coking coal was liable to additional customs duty under section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
Analysis: Additional customs duty under section 3 is linked to the excise duty leviable on a like article if produced or manufactured in India. Coal is not an article produced or manufactured in the relevant sense; it is only raised from the ground. The Coal Mines (Conservation and Development) Act, 1974 uses different language for coal and coke, levying duty on coal raised and dispatched and on coke manufactured and dispatched, which confirms that coal is not treated as a manufactured product. Washing coal to reduce ash content does not amount to manufacture of a new article. The absence of a notification under section 7 of the Coal Mines (Conservation and Development) Act, 1974 also did not alter the position.
Conclusion: The imported coal was not liable to additional customs duty under section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975; the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Additional customs duty under section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 is not leviable where the imported article is not producible or manufacturable in India as the like article, and mere processing such as washing does not amount to manufacture.