Late appeal dismissed for missing filing deadline by Appellate Tribunal. Case law: Singh Enterprises - 2008. The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD as it was filed beyond the condonable period of three months. The appellant filed the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Late appeal dismissed for missing filing deadline by Appellate Tribunal. Case law: Singh Enterprises - 2008.
The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD as it was filed beyond the condonable period of three months. The appellant filed the appeal late, missing the deadline set by the Tribunal. The decision was supported by the case of Singh Enterprises - 2008 (221) ELT 163 (S.C.).
The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD as it was filed beyond the condonable period of three months. The appellant filed the appeal on 20.03.2014 instead of on or before 17.01.2013. The Tribunal cited the case of Singh Enterprises - 2008 (221) ELT 163 (S.C.) to support its decision.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.