<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 347 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252213</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD as it was filed beyond the condonable period of three months. The appellant filed the appeal late, missing the deadline set by the Tribunal. The decision was supported by the case of Singh Enterprises - 2008 (221) ELT 163 (S.C.).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 14:00:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 347 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252213</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD as it was filed beyond the condonable period of three months. The appellant filed the appeal late, missing the deadline set by the Tribunal. The decision was supported by the case of Singh Enterprises - 2008 (221) ELT 163 (S.C.).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>