Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioners were entitled to refund of tax deducted at source from compensation amounts deposited pursuant to a land acquisition award that was subsequently set aside.
Analysis: The compensation amounts were never actually paid to the awardees, and the acquisition proceedings and award were later invalidated. In that situation, the deduction and remittance of tax at source became unnecessary. The Court also noticed the Revenue's stand that refund of TDS ordinarily follows the statutory procedure, including verification whether credit had already been given in the assessments of the concerned deductees. Balancing these aspects, the Court directed the tax to verify whether the deductees had obtained TDS credit and then either refund the amount to the petitioners or require repayment by the deductees if credit had already been granted.
Conclusion: The petitioners were held entitled to relief in principle, but only after verification of assessment credit, with a consequential direction for refund or repayment as the case may be.