<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 293 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252159</link>
    <description>Where compensation deposited under a land acquisition award was never actually paid and the acquisition award was later set aside, deduction and remittance of tax at source became unnecessary. Refund was nevertheless made subject to verification whether the deductees had already received TDS credit in their assessments. If credit had not been granted, the amount was to be refunded to the petitioners; if credit had already been allowed, repayment was to be sought from the deductees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 18:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 293 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252159</link>
      <description>Where compensation deposited under a land acquisition award was never actually paid and the acquisition award was later set aside, deduction and remittance of tax at source became unnecessary. Refund was nevertheless made subject to verification whether the deductees had already received TDS credit in their assessments. If credit had not been granted, the amount was to be refunded to the petitioners; if credit had already been allowed, repayment was to be sought from the deductees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>