Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery should be granted where the appellant, as a sub-contractor, claimed exemption for services rendered in a Special Economic Zone under the relevant service tax notification.
Analysis: The appellant was shown to be a sub-contractor and the main contractor had certified that the services were consumed in a Special Economic Zone. The notification was read as granting exemption to services rendered in a Special Economic Zone without drawing any distinction between a contractor and a sub-contractor. Since there was no dispute that the services were rendered to an SEZ unit, a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit was made out. The question whether the services formed part of authorized operations was left for consideration at the time of final hearing.
Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery was stayed till disposal of the appeal.