<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 241 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252107</link>
    <description>A sub-contractor claiming service tax exemption for services rendered in a Special Economic Zone was held to have made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery. The notification was read as exempting services provided in an SEZ without distinguishing between a contractor and a sub-contractor, and the main contractor&#039;s certification supported the claim that the services were consumed in the SEZ. Whether the services formed part of authorised operations was left open for final hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 08:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=366623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 241 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252107</link>
      <description>A sub-contractor claiming service tax exemption for services rendered in a Special Economic Zone was held to have made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery. The notification was read as exempting services provided in an SEZ without distinguishing between a contractor and a sub-contractor, and the main contractor&#039;s certification supported the claim that the services were consumed in the SEZ. Whether the services formed part of authorised operations was left open for final hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>