Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for entertainment of the statutory appeal under Section 84(3) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994, the appellant was required to deposit the balance pre-deposit so that the appeal could be heard by the appellate authority.
Analysis: The statutory scheme required deposit of 10% of the disputed tax for the appeal to be entertained. As 5% had already been deposited pursuant to the interim order, the Court directed deposit of the remaining 5% within three months. On such deposit, the appellate authority was directed to dispose of the pending appeal within two months, keeping in view the long pendency of the matter.
Conclusion: The appellant was required to make the balance 5% deposit, and upon compliance the appellate authority was to decide the pending appeal expeditiously.
Final Conclusion: The civil appeal was disposed of with directions securing compliance with the pre-deposit condition and expeditious adjudication of the statutory appeal, while leaving the parties' contentions open.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statute makes deposit of a specified percentage of disputed tax a condition for entertainment of an appeal, the appellate forum may insist upon compliance with the full statutory pre-deposit before the appeal is heard.