<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 755 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246786</link>
    <description>Where a statute makes deposit of a specified percentage of disputed tax a condition for entertainment of an appeal, the appellate authority may insist on compliance with the full pre-deposit before the appeal is heard. Here, 10% of the disputed tax was required for the statutory appeal under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, and only 5% had been deposited earlier. The Court directed deposit of the remaining 5% within three months, after which the pending appeal was to be decided expeditiously. The parties&#039; substantive contentions were left open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 07:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 755 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246786</link>
      <description>Where a statute makes deposit of a specified percentage of disputed tax a condition for entertainment of an appeal, the appellate authority may insist on compliance with the full pre-deposit before the appeal is heard. Here, 10% of the disputed tax was required for the statutory appeal under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, and only 5% had been deposited earlier. The Court directed deposit of the remaining 5% within three months, after which the pending appeal was to be decided expeditiously. The parties&#039; substantive contentions were left open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>