Reference of statable questions of law limited to selected issues; repetitive and non-referable questions declined.

The High Court disposed of the application by directing the Tribunal to state the case and refer questions Nos. 2, 5 and 8. It held that no statable question of law arose in respect of the remaining questions, and that question No. 9 was repetitive. The operative effect was limited to reference of the identified questions, with the rest declined for want of a referable legal issue.

---

---

Outcome: The application was disposed of after the Court directed the Tribunal to state the case and refer questions Nos. 2, 5 and 8, holding that no statable question of law arose in respect of the remaining questions and that question No. 9 was repetitive.

---