https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24617 The High Court disposed of the application by directing the Tribunal to state the case and refer questions Nos. 2, 5 and 8. It held that no statable question of law arose in respect of the remaining questions, and that question No. 9 was repetitive. The operative effect was limited to reference of the identified questions, with the rest declined for want of a referable legal issue. en-us Tue, 23 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:33:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24617 The High Court disposed of the application by directing the Tribunal to state the case and refer questions Nos. 2, 5 and 8. It held that no statable question of law arose in respect of the remaining questions, and that question No. 9 was repetitive. The operative effect was limited to reference of the identified questions, with the rest declined for want of a referable legal issue. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 23 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24617