Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2014 (3) TMI 528 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal decisions favor Assessee over Revenue, citing evidence, precedents, business nature. Assessing Officer's additions disallowed for lack of evidence, proper valuation. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and partly allowed the Assessee's appeal. The judgments were based on evidence, legal precedents, and the ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal decisions favor Assessee over Revenue, citing evidence, precedents, business nature. Assessing Officer's additions disallowed for lack of evidence, proper valuation.

                            The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and partly allowed the Assessee's appeal. The judgments were based on evidence, legal precedents, and the nature of the Assessee's business. The additions and disallowances made by the Assessing Officer were deleted or restricted by the CIT(A) and Tribunal on various grounds such as lack of evidence, reasonable expenses, and proper valuation methods. The Tribunal provided specific directions for each issue, emphasizing the importance of individual partner assessments and substantiated claims.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Deletion of addition under section 68 of the Act.
                            2. Deletion of disallowance of labor charges.
                            3. Deletion of addition on account of material recovery.
                            4. Restriction of disallowance of carting expenses.
                            5. Addition on account of valuation of closing work in progress (WIP).
                            6. Disallowance on account of difference in sales tax payment.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Deletion of Addition under Section 68 of the Act:

                            During the assessment, the A.O. noticed discrepancies in the dates of cash introduction by the partners in the firm's books. The A.O. treated Rs. 2,50,000/- as unexplained cash credit under section 68. The CIT(A) deleted the addition, noting that the difference was only in dates and not in the amounts. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, citing that any addition should be made in the hands of individual partners, not the firm. The Tribunal relied on the Gujarat High Court decision in CIT vs. Pankaj Dyestuff Industries.

                            2. Deletion of Disallowance of Labor Charges:

                            The A.O. disallowed Rs. 27,74,439/- of labor charges, citing variations in monthly labor payments and unverified expenses. The CIT(A) deleted the addition, explaining that payments were made on a running account basis and that the percentage of labor expenses was reasonable. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that the A.O. failed to provide contrary evidence.

                            3. Deletion of Addition on Account of Material Recovery:

                            The A.O. added Rs. 99,86,407/- due to doubts about the authenticity of material recovery claims. The CIT(A) found the A.O.'s assumptions baseless and noted that the materials were supplied as per agreements and used in the project. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, stating that the A.O. did not prove that materials were used elsewhere or purchased outside the books.

                            4. Restriction of Disallowance of Carting Expenses:

                            The A.O. disallowed 50% of carting expenses, amounting to Rs. 37,61,619/-, due to unverifiable claims. The CIT(A) reduced the disallowance to 25%, noting that some expenses were unverifiable but not to the extent claimed by the A.O. The Tribunal further reduced the disallowance to Rs. 10 lacs, considering the nature of the business and the inability to provide complete details.

                            5. Addition on Account of Valuation of Closing Work in Progress (WIP):

                            The A.O. added Rs. 16,05,932/- for materials purchased at the year-end but not included in closing stock. The CIT(A) upheld the addition, stating that the Assessee failed to prove consumption before the year-end. The Tribunal agreed with the addition but directed the A.O. to consider it as opening stock in the subsequent year.

                            6. Disallowance on Account of Difference in Sales Tax Payment:

                            The A.O. added Rs. 4,60,476/- due to discrepancies between sales tax paid and reflected in the Profit and Loss account. The CIT(A) upheld the addition, noting that the Assessee could not provide evidence for the difference. The Tribunal remitted the issue to the A.O. for verification of the Assessee's claim that sales tax was paid by Ranjit Construction on its behalf.

                            Conclusion:

                            The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and partly allowed the Assessee's appeal, providing specific directions for each issue. The judgments were based on the evidence provided, legal precedents, and the nature of the Assessee's business.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found