Court affirms disallowance of electricity charges reimbursement in leased building, stresses importance of supporting documentation

The High Court of Kerala upheld the disallowance of Rs.5,40,000/- towards electricity charges reimbursement by the assessee for a leased theatre building. The court found that the original lease agreement placed the responsibility of paying electricity charges on the lessee, and the assessee received rent net of these charges. Despite a subsequent agreement where the assessee agreed to reimburse the charges, the lack of concrete evidence led the Tribunal to reject the claim. The court emphasized the need for supporting documentation, such as the inclusion of reimbursement in the lessee's assessment order, to substantiate the change in terms. Consequently, the Tribunal affirmed the disallowance, ruling in favor of the original lease agreement terms.

---

---

Issues:
1. Disallowance of electricity charges reimbursement.

Analysis:
The judgment delivered by the High Court of Kerala involved the issue of whether the Tribunal was justified in confirming the disallowance of Rs.5,40,000/- towards electricity charges paid by the assessee for a theatre building leased out to another party. The original lease agreement stipulated that the lessee was liable to pay the electricity charges, and the assessee received rent net of these charges. However, during the relevant assessment year, there was a change in the agreement through correspondence, where the assessee agreed to reimburse the electricity charges paid by the lessee amounting to Rs.5,40,000/-. The Tribunal rejected the claim of the assessee due to lack of acceptable evidence. The court noted that if the assessee's claim was genuine, they could have provided documents such as the assessment order completed in the name of the lessee showing the inclusion of the reimbursement amount. Since the rental income originally returned by the assessee was a deduction in the lessee's business income, the reimbursement should have been assessed in the hands of the lessee. However, without clear evidence to support the change in terms, the Tribunal deemed the original agreement regarding payment of electricity charges by the lessee to be still in force. Despite the assessee having an opportunity to rectify the lack of evidence, the Tribunal upheld the disallowance and dismissed the appeal.

---