Court orders DRI to provide seized documents to petitioner under Article 226 The court, in a petition under Article 226, directed the Assistant Director of DRI to provide certified photocopies of documents seized in 2009 that were ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Court orders DRI to provide seized documents to petitioner under Article 226
The court, in a petition under Article 226, directed the Assistant Director of DRI to provide certified photocopies of documents seized in 2009 that were not returned to the petitioner. This decision led to the disposal of the petition.
Issues: - Petition under Article 226 for direction to release seized documents - Request for certified copies of seized documents
Analysis: The judgment pertains to a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution requesting the release of documents seized during a search and seizure operation, with an alternative prayer for certified copies of the seized documents. The Respondents presented a letter dated 6 September 2013, indicating that certain documents had been returned to the petitioner upon request in the past. The court took this letter on record. The court noted that the petitioner had previously requested photocopies of the seized documents in 2009. Consequently, the court directed the Assistant Director of DRI, Nhava Sheva, to provide certified photocopies of the documents seized on 19 July 2009 that had not been returned to the petitioner. As a result, the petition was disposed of based on this direction issued by the court.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
