<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 493 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243896</link>
    <description>The court, in a petition under Article 226, directed the Assistant Director of DRI to provide certified photocopies of documents seized in 2009 that were not returned to the petitioner. This decision led to the disposal of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 16:06:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345721" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 493 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243896</link>
      <description>The court, in a petition under Article 226, directed the Assistant Director of DRI to provide certified photocopies of documents seized in 2009 that were not returned to the petitioner. This decision led to the disposal of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>