Revenue appeal partially allowed; interest payment disallowed, corporate status expenses upheld.

The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue's appeal, holding that interest paid to UFPL was non-allowable under Section 36(1)(iii) and rejecting the set off of interest paid against interest received. The Tribunal upheld the allowance of expenses and deductions related to maintaining corporate status, even in the absence of substantial business activity. The assessee's cross-objection was dismissed.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Allowability of interest income as income from other sources.
2. Allowability of expenses without business activity.
3. Set off of interest paid against interest received.
4. Disallowance of expenses.

Issue 1: Allowability of Interest Income:
The Revenue contended that the interest income of Rs.1,13,50,138/- should be considered as income from other sources and set off against the interest paid. The Assessing Officer disallowed the interest paid to UFPL under Section 36(1)(iii) as the borrowed money was not used for business purposes. The CIT(A) upheld this finding. The Tribunal agreed that the borrowed amount was invested, not for business but as a capital investment, making the interest expenditure non-allowable under Section 36(1)(iii). The Tribunal concurred with the CIT(A) on this issue.

Issue 2: Allowability of Expenses without Business Activity:
The Revenue challenged the allowance of expenses of Rs.61,191/- by the CIT(A) without business activity. The Tribunal held that even in the absence of active business, certain expenses necessary to maintain corporate status are allowable deductions. The Tribunal found that the assessee conducted business on a small scale during the relevant period. The Tribunal concluded that disallowance of the expenses was not justified, rejecting the Revenue's appeal on this ground.

Issue 3: Set off of Interest Paid against Interest Received:
Regarding the set off of interest paid to UFPL against interest received from City Guide Yellow Pages Pvt.Ltd., the CIT(A) allowed the set off based on hypothetical events. However, the Tribunal disagreed, stating that the interest paid on non-business borrowing cannot be set off against interest income. The Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)'s decision and upheld the Assessing Officer's stance, rejecting the set off.

Issue 4: Disallowance of Expenses:
The Revenue's appeal included the disallowance of expenses of Rs.61,191/-, which the CIT(A) had allowed. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, stating that the expenses were of a general nature and necessary for maintaining corporate status, even in the absence of significant business activity. The Tribunal found the disallowance unjustified and rejected the Revenue's appeal on this ground.

In conclusion, the Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue's appeal and dismissed the assessee's cross-objection, holding that the interest paid to UFPL was non-allowable under Section 36(1)(iii) and rejecting the set off of interest paid against interest received. The Tribunal also upheld the allowance of expenses and deductions related to maintaining the corporate status, even in the absence of substantial business activity.

---