<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 3 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240338</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, holding that interest paid to UFPL was non-allowable under Section 36(1)(iii) and rejecting the set off of interest paid against interest received. The Tribunal upheld the allowance of expenses and deductions related to maintaining corporate status, even in the absence of substantial business activity. The assessee&#039;s cross-objection was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2013 20:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 3 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240338</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, holding that interest paid to UFPL was non-allowable under Section 36(1)(iii) and rejecting the set off of interest paid against interest received. The Tribunal upheld the allowance of expenses and deductions related to maintaining corporate status, even in the absence of substantial business activity. The assessee&#039;s cross-objection was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>