Film Groups Penalized for Anti-Competitive Practices Over 'Mausam'; Ordered to End Unfair Supply Limits and Modify Rules.

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) determined that the film distributors' associations, TTFDA, KFCC, and APFCC, contravened Section 3(1) read with Section 3(3)(b) of the Competition Act, 2002 by issuing circulars that limited and controlled the supply of the film 'Mausam'. These actions were aimed at coercing the informant to settle a financial dispute with M/s Suresh Productions. Under Section 27 of the Act, the CCI ordered these associations to cease such practices and directed APFCC to amend its rules to eliminate anti-competitive provisions. A penalty of Rs. 12,89,735 was imposed on APFCC, while TTFDA and KFCC faced no additional penalties due to prior sanctions in similar cases. The parties were required to comply immediately and submit an undertaking within 30 days.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Alleged contravention of Sections 3 and 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 by film distributors' associations.
2. Specific grievances regarding the release of the film 'Mausam'.
3. Findings and conclusions of the Director General (DG) investigation.
4. Replies and objections from the opposite parties.
5. Analysis and final decision by the Competition Commission of India (CCI).

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Alleged Contravention of Sections 3 and 4 of the Competition Act, 2002:

The informant, M/s Cinergy Independent Film Services Pvt. Ltd., alleged that film distributors' associations (TTFDA, KFCC, APFCC) and others enforced compulsory membership and film registration, hindering free competition. These associations allegedly coerced distributors to sign restrictive agreements, limiting their rights over films. The informant claimed that these actions contravened Sections 3 and 4 of the Competition Act, 2002.

2. Specific Grievances Regarding the Release of the Film 'Mausam':

The informant alleged that TTFDA and APFCC issued circulars to their members to boycott the film 'Mausam' unless a claim of Rs.2.5 crores by M/s Suresh Productions Pvt. Ltd. was settled. This action allegedly aimed to pressure the informant to resolve a financial dispute involving M/s Big Bang Media Pvt. Ltd., which had connections with the informant. The informant argued that these actions were arbitrary and aimed at securing payment for M/s Suresh Productions Pvt. Ltd.

3. Findings and Conclusions of the DG Investigation:

The DG's investigation concluded that TTFDA, KFCC, and APFCC engaged in anti-competitive practices by limiting and controlling film distribution and exhibition. The DG found that these associations coerced producers and distributors, restricting the market and violating Section 3(3)(b) of the Act. However, no contraventions were found against IMPEX and M/s Big Bang Media Pvt. Ltd.

4. Replies and Objections from the Opposite Parties:

KFCC:
KFCC argued that its membership was voluntary and it did not impose restrictions on film distribution. It claimed that its actions were aimed at resolving disputes amicably and promoting the Kannada film industry. KFCC denied issuing any directives regarding 'Mausam' and contended that the DG's findings were baseless and erroneous.

TTFDA:
TTFDA stated that it did not impose compulsory membership or registration. It clarified that the circular regarding 'Mausam' was issued in response to a complaint from M/s Suresh Film Distributors and was later withdrawn. TTFDA denied any anti-competitive conduct.

APFCC:
APFCC highlighted that M/s Cinergy and M/s Big Bang Media were interconnected and had a financial dispute with M/s Suresh Productions. APFCC claimed that its letter aimed to facilitate an amicable settlement and did not impose any restrictions. APFCC also argued that its rules did not completely restrict dealings with non-members.

5. Analysis and Final Decision by the CCI:

The CCI examined the DG's report, the replies from the opposite parties, and the relevant evidence. It found that TTFDA, KFCC, and APFCC issued circulars/letters to limit/control the supply of the film 'Mausam', violating Section 3(1) read with Section 3(3)(b) of the Act. The CCI noted that these actions aimed to pressure the informant to settle the financial dispute with M/s Suresh Productions.

Order under Section 27 of the Act:

The CCI directed TTFDA, KFCC, and APFCC to cease and desist from pressurizing distributors to settle monetary disputes. It also instructed APFCC to modify its rules to remove anti-competitive provisions. The CCI imposed a penalty on APFCC at the rate of 10% of its average income/receipts for the last three financial years, amounting to Rs. 12,89,735.1. TTFDA and KFCC were not subjected to additional penalties due to previous penalties imposed in similar cases.

The CCI directed the opposite parties to comply with the order immediately and file an undertaking within 30 days. The Secretary was instructed to inform the parties accordingly.

---