https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221965 The Competition Commission of India (CCI) determined that the film distributors' associations, TTFDA, KFCC, and APFCC, contravened Section 3(1) read with Section 3(3)(b) of the Competition Act, 2002 by issuing circulars that limited and controlled the supply of the film 'Mausam'. These actions were aimed at coercing the informant to settle a financial dispute with M/s Suresh Productions. Under Section 27 of the Act, the CCI ordered these associations to cease such practices and directed APFCC to amend its rules to eliminate anti-competitive provisions. A penalty of Rs. 12,89,735 was imposed on APFCC, while TTFDA and KFCC faced no additional penalties due to prior sanctions in similar cases. The parties were required to comply immediately and submit an undertaking within 30 days. en-us Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Nov 2024 17:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221965 The Competition Commission of India (CCI) determined that the film distributors' associations, TTFDA, KFCC, and APFCC, contravened Section 3(1) read with Section 3(3)(b) of the Competition Act, 2002 by issuing circulars that limited and controlled the supply of the film 'Mausam'. These actions were aimed at coercing the informant to settle a financial dispute with M/s Suresh Productions. Under Section 27 of the Act, the CCI ordered these associations to cease such practices and directed APFCC to amend its rules to eliminate anti-competitive provisions. A penalty of Rs. 12,89,735 was imposed on APFCC, while TTFDA and KFCC faced no additional penalties due to prior sanctions in similar cases. The parties were required to comply immediately and submit an undertaking within 30 days. Case-Laws Law of Competition Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221965