Remand for fresh adjudication after earlier final order required the same treatment in connected matters.

The impugned order was set aside because it required the same treatment as the earlier final order in connected matters. The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh reconsideration in accordance with the directions contained in that earlier order.

---

---

Issues: Whether the impugned order was liable to be set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication in view of the earlier final order.

Analysis: The impugned order was found to require the same treatment as the earlier order passed in connected matters. The matter was therefore sent back to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration afresh in terms of the directions contained in the earlier final order.

Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration.

---