<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 169 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220063</link>
    <description>The impugned order was set aside because it required the same treatment as the earlier final order in connected matters. The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh reconsideration in accordance with the directions contained in that earlier order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:57:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 169 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220063</link>
      <description>The impugned order was set aside because it required the same treatment as the earlier final order in connected matters. The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh reconsideration in accordance with the directions contained in that earlier order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>