Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of the duty demand arising from denial of exemption under Notification No. 6/2002-CE dated 02.03.2002.
Analysis: The exemption notification was read as extending to solar lanterns, and the goods in question were found to be solar lanterns capable of being charged by a solar module for two lanterns at a time. The notification was not found to contain any condition limiting the exemption to only one lantern. On that basis, the applicants were held to have made out a prima facie case in their favour.
Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery was stayed during pendency of the appeal.
Final Conclusion: The application succeeded on the basis of a prima facie entitlement to the exemption claimed, resulting in interim protection against recovery.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the exemption notification does not impose a restriction limiting the benefit to a single lantern, the benefit cannot be denied at the stage of pre-deposit if the assessee otherwise shows a strong prima facie case.