<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 261 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218246</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 6/2002-CE was read as covering solar lanterns, and the goods were found to be solar lanterns capable of being charged by a solar module for two lanterns at a time. Because the notification contained no restriction limiting the benefit to a single lantern, the applicants established a prima facie case for exemption. On that basis, waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery of the duty demand was stayed during pendency of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 13:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 261 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218246</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 6/2002-CE was read as covering solar lanterns, and the goods were found to be solar lanterns capable of being charged by a solar module for two lanterns at a time. Because the notification contained no restriction limiting the benefit to a single lantern, the applicants established a prima facie case for exemption. On that basis, waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery of the duty demand was stayed during pendency of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>