Penalty for delayed excise duty payment remanded for fresh hearing on Rule 25 applicability and mitigating circumstances.

Penalty for delayed payment of excise duty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 was required to be reconsidered because the appellant contended that such delay, if penalised at all, fell under Rule 27 rather than Rule 25. The Revenue maintained that relief depended on the facts, including any stringent financial condition. To permit the appellant to place mitigating circumstances and secure a fair adjudication, the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration, a reasoned order, and due regard to the cited judgment.

---

---

Issues: Whether the matter concerning levy of penalty for delayed payment of excise duty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 required reconsideration, and whether the appellant should be given an opportunity to establish mitigating circumstances.

Analysis: The appellant relied on the view that penalty would not be attracted under Rule 25 in cases of delay in payment of duty and that, if any penalty was to be imposed, it would fall under Rule 27. The Revenue contended that any relief depended on the facts, including the existence of stringent financial condition. In order to enable the appellant to place its case on such circumstances and to secure a fair adjudication, the matter was sent back to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration and a reasoned order.

Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication after giving the appellant a fair hearing and considering the judgment cited.

---