Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in a dispute concerning classification of coal grinding activity under business auxiliary service.
Analysis: The applicant's activity was limited to processing of goods by grinding coal during the relevant period. On the material before it, such processing was not covered within the scope of business auxiliary service for that period, while the wider inclusion of processing on behalf of others came later. The applicant was therefore found to have made out a strong prima facie case for interim relief.
Outcome: Pre-deposit of service tax, interest and penalty was waived and recovery was stayed during pendency of the appeal; the stay petitions were allowed.