<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 819 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211251</link>
    <description>Coal grinding activity was treated as mere processing of goods during the relevant period, and that activity was not within the scope of business auxiliary service at that time because the wider inclusion of processing on behalf of others came later. On that basis, a strong prima facie case for interim relief was made out, and pre-deposit of service tax, interest and penalty was waived while recovery was stayed during pendency of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 18:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 819 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211251</link>
      <description>Coal grinding activity was treated as mere processing of goods during the relevant period, and that activity was not within the scope of business auxiliary service at that time because the wider inclusion of processing on behalf of others came later. On that basis, a strong prima facie case for interim relief was made out, and pre-deposit of service tax, interest and penalty was waived while recovery was stayed during pendency of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>