TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Interpretation of Tax Tribunal's Powers on Unraised Deductions Upheld</h1> <h3>Commissioner Of Income-Tax Versus Ahmedabad Crucible Company</h3> Commissioner Of Income-Tax Versus Ahmedabad Crucible Company - [1994] 206 ITR 574, 124 CTR 104, 76 TAXMANN 109 Issues Involved: The judgment involves the interpretation of the powers of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner to consider aspects not raised before the Income-tax Officer and the jurisdiction of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal in confirming such decisions.Judgment Details:Issue 1:The Appellate Assistant Commissioner's authority to set aside the assessment order for consideration of an aspect not previously raised before the Income-tax Officer.The Appellate Assistant Commissioner accepted the assessee's claim for deduction of the value of quota rights and license, even though it was not specifically claimed before the Income-tax Officer. The Tribunal upheld this decision based on previous court rulings.Issue 2:The legality of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal confirming the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's decision to set aside the assessment for consideration of an aspect not previously raised before the Income-tax Officer.The Tribunal's decision was deemed lawful based on established principles that the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's powers extend to the subject-matter of the assessment, allowing for corrections even if not challenged by the assessee.Issue 3:The correctness of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal's order in confirming the decision to set aside the assessment for computation of capital gains.The Tribunal's decision was found to be in line with precedents, emphasizing that the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's jurisdiction covers all points arising from the subject-matter of the assessment, not just the subject-matter of the appeal.The judgment concluded that the Tribunal was correct in addressing the questions raised and ruled in favor of the assessee, citing previous court decisions to support the interpretation of the powers of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Tribunal. Each question was answered affirmatively in favor of the assessee, and the reference was resolved accordingly with no costs awarded.
TaxTMI 