Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants made out a prima facie case for total waiver of pre-deposit in the dispute concerning utilisation of Cenvat credit for payment of service tax on outward GTA service.
Analysis: The claim for waiver was considered in the context of the period in dispute and the reliance placed on the omission of the explanation to Rule 2(p) by Notification No. 8/2006-C.E. (N.T.) and the subsequent amendment and Notification No. 10/2008-C.E. (N.T.). Since the latter notification was not placed before the Commissioner (Appeals), the applicants were held not to have established a case for complete waiver of the tax and penalty demand at the interim stage.
Conclusion: Total waiver of pre-deposit was declined. The applicants were directed to deposit Rs. 1 lakh, and on such deposit the balance tax and penalty were waived and recovery stayed pending disposal of the appeal.