<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 823 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202078</link>
    <description>Prima facie entitlement to complete waiver of pre-deposit was not established in a dispute over utilisation of Cenvat credit to pay service tax on outward GTA service. The interim waiver request was examined against the relevant period and the effect of the omission of the explanation to Rule 2(p) by Notification No. 8/2006-C.E. (N.T.), together with the later amendment and Notification No. 10/2008-C.E. (N.T.). As the later notification had not been placed before the Commissioner (Appeals), complete waiver of tax and penalty was declined. Partial relief was granted on deposit of Rs. 1 lakh, with the balance waived and recovery stayed pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 823 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202078</link>
      <description>Prima facie entitlement to complete waiver of pre-deposit was not established in a dispute over utilisation of Cenvat credit to pay service tax on outward GTA service. The interim waiver request was examined against the relevant period and the effect of the omission of the explanation to Rule 2(p) by Notification No. 8/2006-C.E. (N.T.), together with the later amendment and Notification No. 10/2008-C.E. (N.T.). As the later notification had not been placed before the Commissioner (Appeals), complete waiver of tax and penalty was declined. Partial relief was granted on deposit of Rs. 1 lakh, with the balance waived and recovery stayed pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>