Writ petition challenging excise appeal rejection dismissed due to delay exceeding condonable period The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed a writ petition challenging the rejection of an appeal under section 35 of the Central Excise Act due to a 21-month ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Writ petition challenging excise appeal rejection dismissed due to delay exceeding condonable period
The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed a writ petition challenging the rejection of an appeal under section 35 of the Central Excise Act due to a 21-month delay, exceeding the condonable period. The court held the rejection lawful, noting the absence of authority to provide relief under Article 141 or Section 142 of the Constitution.
The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed a writ petition where an appeal under section 35 of the Central Excise Act was rejected due to a delay of 21 months, which exceeded the allowable period for condonation. The court found no illegality in the rejection of the appeal and cited the lack of power to grant relief under Article 141 or Section 142 of the Constitution.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.