Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is excluded or overridden by rule 184 of the Defence and Internal Security of India Rules, 1971 in cases relating to contravention of those Rules, and whether anticipatory bail can be granted subject to the conditions reflected in rule 184.
Analysis: Section 438 confers power on the Court of Session or the High Court to direct release on bail in anticipation of arrest for a non-bailable offence. Rule 184, by contrast, does not create an independent bail power; it imposes restrictions on release on bail where a person accused or convicted of a contravention is already in custody, requiring an opportunity to oppose the application and, in specified cases, reasonable grounds to believe that the accused is not guilty. The two provisions operate at different stages and are not truly inconsistent. The non obstante clause in rule 184 therefore does not effect an implied repeal of section 438. At the same time, the policy underlying rule 184 must guide the exercise of power under section 438, so that the Court ordinarily gives notice to the prosecution and applies the protective conditions in rule 184 while considering anticipatory bail in such cases.
Conclusion: Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is not repealed or overridden by rule 184 of the Defence and Internal Security of India Rules, 1971, and anticipatory bail remains available subject to the guiding conditions embodied in rule 184.