Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether an application for anticipatory bail is maintainable after the charge sheet has been filed in court.
Analysis: Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is a beneficent provision intended to protect personal liberty and the presumption of innocence. The provision does not impose any express restriction limiting the stage up to which an application may be entertained. The Constitution Bench authorities were read to mean that anticipatory bail may be sought so long as the applicant has not been arrested, and the filing of a charge sheet does not by itself extinguish that remedy. The Court also held that the word "arrest" in Section 438 cannot be stretched to include every later appearance or surrender before the court after cognizance, because that would introduce a restriction not found in the statute and would render the provision unduly narrow.
Conclusion: Yes. An application for anticipatory bail remains maintainable even after the charge sheet has been filed in court.
Ratio Decidendi: In the absence of an express statutory restriction, Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 cannot be confined by judicially created temporal limits, and filing of a charge sheet does not by itself bar an application for anticipatory bail.