Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1995 (3) TMI 82 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        High Court rules gifts to trustees not an oral trust under Income-tax Act, rejects Revenue's tax argument The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee trusts, determining that the gifts received by the trustees did not constitute an oral trust under the ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            High Court rules gifts to trustees not an oral trust under Income-tax Act, rejects Revenue's tax argument

                            The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee trusts, determining that the gifts received by the trustees did not constitute an oral trust under the Income-tax Act. The court held that the gifts were part of the existing trust corpus and did not establish a separate oral trust, thereby rejecting the Revenue's argument for taxing the income at the maximum marginal rate. The judgment offers a comprehensive examination of the legal framework concerning oral trusts and their impact on the taxation of trust income.




                            Issues:
                            Interpretation of provisions related to oral trust under the Income-tax Act.
                            Determining the tax rate applicable to income of a trust based on the existence of an oral trust.
                            Analysis of whether gifts received by trustees constitute an oral trust under Explanation 2 to section 160 of the Income-tax Act.
                            Application of Explanation (ii) to section 164A for charging income at the maximum marginal rate in case of an oral trust.

                            Interpretation of Provisions Related to Oral Trust:
                            The judgment pertains to appeals concerning three trusts where the question arises regarding the tax treatment of gifts received by trustees. The Income-tax Officer initially accepted the income returns filed by the trusts, but the Commissioner of Income-tax contended that the gifts constituted an oral trust, subjecting the income to the maximum tax rate. The Tribunal later ruled that the gifts were part of the trust corpus, not forming a separate oral trust. The crux of the issue lies in the interpretation of provisions under the Income-tax Act concerning oral trusts and the tax implications thereof.

                            Tax Rate Applicable to Trust Income and Oral Trust Existence:
                            The dispute revolves around the tax rate applicable to trust income, specifically whether Explanation (ii) to section 164A is relevant in this case. Section 164A mandates that income received under an oral trust is to be taxed at the maximum marginal rate. The contention of the Revenue was that the gifts received by trustees constituted an oral trust as per Explanation 2 to section 160 of the Income-tax Act. The critical aspect is determining whether the gifts received indeed form an oral trust as defined under the relevant provisions.

                            Analysis of Gifts Received by Trustees as Oral Trust:
                            The core argument presented by the Revenue is that the gifts received by the trustees, being part of a private trust, constitute an oral trust under the Income-tax Act. The definition of an oral trust under Explanation 2 to section 160 is crucial in this context. The judgment delves into the specifics of what constitutes an oral trust, emphasizing the necessity for a trust to be declared in writing. The crux of the matter is whether the act of gifting cash to trustees of an existing trust amounts to creating a fresh oral trust, as per the legal provisions and precedents cited.

                            Application of Explanation (ii) to Section 164A for Taxation Purposes:
                            The judgment extensively analyzes the provisions of Explanation (ii) to section 164A, which stipulates the taxation of income under an oral trust at the maximum marginal rate. The court scrutinizes the definition of oral trust provided under the Income-tax Act and its implications on the taxation of trust income. The decision ultimately hinges on whether the gifts received by the trustees can be categorized as forming an oral trust, thereby affecting the tax liability of the trusts involved.

                            Conclusion:
                            In conclusion, the High Court ruled in favor of the assessee trusts, holding that the gifts received by the trustees did not constitute an oral trust under the provisions of the Income-tax Act. The court's decision was based on the finding that the gifts were accepted within the framework of the existing trust deed and did not give rise to the creation of a separate oral trust. As a result, the income of the trusts was not subject to taxation at the maximum marginal rate as contended by the Revenue. The judgment provides a detailed analysis of the legal aspects surrounding oral trusts and their implications on the taxation of trust income under the Income-tax Act.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found