Pre-deposit non-compliance barred restoration of the appeal, and the Tribunal refused to recall the earlier dismissal.

Failure to comply with a pre-deposit direction led to dismissal of the appeal, and the request to recall that dismissal was rejected because the required amount had still not been deposited. The Tribunal examined the earlier order and the compliance report, found no basis to revisit the dismissal, and maintained the order refusing to entertain the appeal further. The operative point is that non-compliance with the pre-deposit condition remained ative, so restoration of the appeal was not allowed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the earlier dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance with the pre-deposit direction should be recalled and the appeal restored.

Analysis: The application was examined in the light of the prior order directing pre-deposit and the report confirming that the required amount had not been deposited. The Tribunal found no merit in revisiting the earlier dismissal order.

Conclusion: The request for restoration was rejected and the earlier dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance with the pre-deposit direction was maintained.

---