https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191302 Failure to comply with a pre-deposit direction led to dismissal of the appeal, and the request to recall that dismissal was rejected because the required amount had still not been deposited. The Tribunal examined the earlier order and the compliance report, found no basis to revisit the dismissal, and maintained the order refusing to entertain the appeal further. The operative point is that non-compliance with the pre-deposit condition remained ative, so restoration of the appeal was not allowed. en-us Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Mar 2017 09:37:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191302 Failure to comply with a pre-deposit direction led to dismissal of the appeal, and the request to recall that dismissal was rejected because the required amount had still not been deposited. The Tribunal examined the earlier order and the compliance report, found no basis to revisit the dismissal, and maintained the order refusing to entertain the appeal further. The operative point is that non-compliance with the pre-deposit condition remained ative, so restoration of the appeal was not allowed. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191302