Supreme Court directs reevaluation of Deputy Municipal Commissioner appointment, emphasizes Corporation's role.

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment in a case concerning the appointment process for the post of Deputy Municipal Commissioner in the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay. The Court emphasized that the Corporation should have been given the opportunity to consider the recommendation before any legal challenge was initiated. The Corporation was directed to independently reconsider the appointment within three months, with the Court clarifying that interim appointments would not affect the parties' rights. The question of seniority was reserved for separate litigation, and the Corporation was instructed to make an unbiased decision without being influenced by prior observations. The appeal was allowed, the writ petition was dismissed, and each party was directed to bear their respective costs.

---

---

Issues:
Appointment to the post of Deputy Municipal Commissioner in the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay.

Analysis:
The judgment revolves around the appointment process for the post of Deputy Municipal Commissioner in the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay. The appellant, who was already employed in various capacities within the Corporation, applied for the position when the Corporation decided to recruit through the Public Service Commission from the open market. The Public Service Commission recommended the appellant for the post, but before the Corporation could make a decision, a writ petition was filed challenging the recommendation based on the appellant's qualifications. The High Court quashed the recommendation, stating that the appellant did not meet the required administrative experience of 10 years. However, the Supreme Court found the writ petition premature, emphasizing that the Corporation should have been given the opportunity to consider the recommendation before any legal challenge. The Court highlighted that the Corporation had the authority to accept the recommendation, request other names, and make its own choice, followed by confirmation by the State Government.

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment, allowing the Corporation to reconsider the matter independently. The Court directed the Corporation to make a decision regarding the appointment within three months and clarified that any interim or ad hoc appointments would not impact the parties' rights. Additionally, the Court specified that the question of seniority of the appointee would be addressed in separate litigation, and this judgment did not decide on that issue. The Corporation was instructed to make its decision without being influenced by the High Court's previous observations, ensuring an unbiased and independent assessment. The appeal was allowed, the writ petition was dismissed, and each party was directed to bear their respective costs in both the Supreme Court and the High Court.

---