<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (2) TMI 267 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189842</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment in a case concerning the appointment process for the post of Deputy Municipal Commissioner in the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay. The Court emphasized that the Corporation should have been given the opportunity to consider the recommendation before any legal challenge was initiated. The Corporation was directed to independently reconsider the appointment within three months, with the Court clarifying that interim appointments would not affect the parties&#039; rights. The question of seniority was reserved for separate litigation, and the Corporation was instructed to make an unbiased decision without being influenced by prior observations. The appeal was allowed, the writ petition was dismissed, and each party was directed to bear their respective costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2017 13:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=456165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (2) TMI 267 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189842</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment in a case concerning the appointment process for the post of Deputy Municipal Commissioner in the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay. The Court emphasized that the Corporation should have been given the opportunity to consider the recommendation before any legal challenge was initiated. The Corporation was directed to independently reconsider the appointment within three months, with the Court clarifying that interim appointments would not affect the parties&#039; rights. The question of seniority was reserved for separate litigation, and the Corporation was instructed to make an unbiased decision without being influenced by prior observations. The appeal was allowed, the writ petition was dismissed, and each party was directed to bear their respective costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>