Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: No substantive issue was finally adjudicated; the order only concerned the manner of drawing and testing samples and compliance.
Analysis: By consent of both sides, the samples were directed to be drawn in their presence and sent to an identified laboratory for testing. The order also fixed the time for completion of sampling and testing, placed the cost of analysis on the applicant, and required compliance reporting. The direction was tied to testing under the Hazardous Waste (Management, Handling and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2008.
Conclusion: No merits-based determination was made; the matter was disposed of by procedural directions regarding sample testing.
Final Conclusion: The order is confined to interim compliance and laboratory testing directions and does not decide the underlying customs dispute.