Supreme Court dismisses special leave petitions for lack of merits despite condoning delay. The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions due to lack of merits, despite condoning the delay. The case was presided over by Dr. Justice ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Supreme Court dismisses special leave petitions for lack of merits despite condoning delay.
The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions due to lack of merits, despite condoning the delay. The case was presided over by Dr. Justice Arijit Pasayat and Dr. Justice Mukundakam Sharma. The petitioner was represented by Mr. K.Radhakrishnan, Mr. H.Raghavendra Rao, Mr. Siddharth Choudhary, MS. Anil Katiyar, and Mrs. Anil Katiyar. (2009 (2) TMI 854 - SC)
The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions after condoning the delay, as there were no merits found. The citation is 2009 (2) TMI 854 - SC. Dr. Justice Arijit Pasayat and Dr. Justice Mukundakam Sharma presided over the case. Petitioner represented by Mr. K.Radhakrishnan, Mr. H.Raghavendra Rao, Mr. Siddharth Choudhary, MS. Anil Katiyar, and Mrs. Anil Katiyar.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.