<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 854 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186087</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions due to lack of merits, despite condoning the delay. The case was presided over by Dr. Justice Arijit Pasayat and Dr. Justice Mukundakam Sharma. The petitioner was represented by Mr. K.Radhakrishnan, Mr. H.Raghavendra Rao, Mr. Siddharth Choudhary, MS. Anil Katiyar, and Mrs. Anil Katiyar. (2009 (2) TMI 854 - SC)</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 10:57:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 854 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186087</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions due to lack of merits, despite condoning the delay. The case was presided over by Dr. Justice Arijit Pasayat and Dr. Justice Mukundakam Sharma. The petitioner was represented by Mr. K.Radhakrishnan, Mr. H.Raghavendra Rao, Mr. Siddharth Choudhary, MS. Anil Katiyar, and Mrs. Anil Katiyar. (2009 (2) TMI 854 - SC)</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>