TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal upholds decision on unexplained cash credits under Income-tax Act, 1961</h1> <h3>Commissioner Of Income-Tax Versus K. MN Naidu</h3> The Tribunal upheld the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's decision in a case concerning unexplained cash credits in an individual's income under the ... Rejection Of Accounts Issues:1. Interpretation of Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding the treatment of unexplained cash credits in an individual's income.2. Determining the appropriate amount for unexplained cash credit based on rejected account books.Analysis:The judgment pertains to the interpretation of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in relation to unexplained cash credits in an individual's income. The case involved the assessment of an individual for the year 1973-74, where the Income-tax Officer found discrepancies in the income reported by the assessee. The Income-tax Officer added a certain amount to the income under the head of 'Other sources' due to unexplained cash credits found in the capital account. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner later reduced this amount based on the argument that the Income-tax Officer should not have relied on the rejected account books for determining the unexplained cash credit.Upon appeal by the Department, the Tribunal upheld the decision of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. The Department argued that the Income-tax Officer was justified in relying on the rejected account books for adding unexplained cash credits, citing relevant case laws. However, the counsel for the assessee contended that if the account books were rejected for determining business income, they should not be used for calculating unexplained cash credits.The Tribunal and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner emphasized that while the Income-tax Officer can rely on rejected account books for assessing unexplained cash credits, it may not be reasonable to do so when the same books were deemed defective for estimating business income. The Tribunal's decision was based on the specific facts of the case, concluding that the Income-tax Officer should accept the amount shown in the balance-sheet as unexplained cash credit.In the final analysis, the court found no legal infirmity in the Tribunal's decision and ruled in favor of the assessee. The judgment highlights the importance of consistency in the treatment of account books for different aspects of income assessment under the Income-tax Act, 1961.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
