TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether, after rejection of books of account, estimation of net profit at 10% of gross turnover was justified. (ii) Whether separate additions under section 68 towards sundry creditors and unsecured loans could survive after rejection of books and estimation of income.
Issue (i): Whether, after rejection of books of account, estimation of net profit at 10% of gross turnover was justified.
Analysis: The books were rejected for want of complete supporting material and the assessment was framed on best judgment basis. Even so, income estimation had to rest on a reasonable and rational basis, taking into account business nature, past history and comparable material. The rate adopted by the Assessing Officer had no supporting comparable or cogent basis, while the assessee's business was in government contract works with higher operating costs and fluctuating margins. Past profit history also showed lower declared results.
Conclusion: The estimation at 10% was held to be excessive. The net profit rate was reduced to 6% of gross turnover, and the issue was decided partly in favour of the Revenue.
Issue (ii): Whether separate additions under section 68 towards sundry creditors and unsecured loans could survive after rejection of books and estimation of income.
Analysis: Once business income is determined on estimated basis after rejection of books, a separate addition for trading liabilities or business-related credits ordinarily cannot be sustained without independent incriminating material. The sundry creditors addition lacked such material and was liable to telescoping against the estimated income. As to unsecured loans, the assessee failed to establish identity, creditworthiness and genuineness to the requisite extent, and in the circumstances the addition was not sustainable on the legal footing adopted by the Tribunal after rejection of books.
Conclusion: The additions under section 68 towards sundry creditors and unsecured loans were deleted.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only to the limited extent of modification of the profit rate, while the deletions of the section 68 additions were upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: After rejection of books of account, profit must be estimated on a reasonable basis, and separate additions for business-linked credits are ordinarily unsustainable absent independent incriminating material.
TaxTMI 
